Finance Department urges AFP to examine Defence Housing Australia

Updated

Mar 27, 2016 20:50:38

Federal Police have been asked to examine a supervision group that controls some-more than $10 billion value of counterclaim housing, sparking uninformed concerns in a troops about a destiny of a organisation.

Defence Housing Australia (DHA) strike a headlines late final year when a ABC suggested a afterwards handling director, Peter Howman, had unexpected resigned.

The ABC has now reliable a Finance Department has asked a Australian Federal Police (AFP) to examine a organisation, though it is misleading what has stirred a request.

“The Department of Finance has referred a matter concerning Defence Housing Australia to a AFP,” a mouthpiece for a Finance Department said.

“As this matter is a theme of ongoing AFP process, it would not be suitable to criticism further.”

The AFP would not give any sum concerning a matter.

“The AFP can endorse receipt of a mention from a Department of Finance concerning Defence Housing Australia,” a AFP pronounced in a statement.

“As this matter is now underneath evaluation, it would not be suitable to criticism further.”

Peter Howman and Captain Katherine Richards, RAN, open a initial upgraded residence of HMAS Cerberus.
Photo:

Mr Howman “was changed on since he was so good during facing a evidence to privatise or item frame it,” pronounced Neil James from a Australia Defence Association. (Dept of Defence: ABIS Dove Smithett)

Former DHA trainer Peter Howman pronounced he was confused by a Finance Department’s pierce on a agency.

“From what we understand, a matter from a AFP and Department of Finance is referring to Defence Housing Australia — it’s not referring to myself, and it’s unequivocally a matter for DHA to respond to, not myself and a Department of Finance and a AFP, and we wouldn’t wish to get concerned with any discussions they might be having,” Mr Howman said.

Senior total in a troops pronounced they believed some inside a Federal Government were pulling to privatise DHA, that manages a genuine estate portfolio value some-more than $10 billion.

At present, a organisation’s dual critical shareholders are a Department of Finance and a Department of Defence.

Defence Association opposite DHA privatisation

Neil James from a Australia Defence Association pronounced privatising a DHA would be a really disastrous step.

“As a Chief of a Defence Force has done utterly clear, and indeed so has a Secretary and a Minister — DHA should not be privatised,” Mr James said.

“This is not a common Government-business craving — this is a critical counterclaim capability enabler and one of a reasons since Peter Howman was changed on was since he was so good during facing a evidence to privatise or item frame it.”

DHA authority Sandy Macdonald pronounced he had “nothing serve to supplement to a statements done by a Australian Federal Police and a Department of Finance”.

The Federal Government insists it has no skeleton to privatise DHA.

Topics:

defence-and-national-security,

australia

First posted

Mar 27, 2016 20:32:22


Contact Andrew Greene

About admin